Freebsd has more up to date packages than Ubuntu

This is effectively a "why can't FreeBSD be more like..." thread. By stating the thread's subject, you are inviting the opposite line of argumentation. It's also a flawed comparison between FreeBSD and a particular Linux distro.

There will be Linux distros with newer versions of packages than their equivalents in FreeBSD ports and those with packages absent from the ports tree. Newer isn't always better. There is both newer software that fixes bugs and that which introduces new ones.

Many Linux distributions have a practice of backporting specific security patches from newer versions to older versions. This, in theory, can work well enough except where the backporter fails to understand the patch they are adapting and applying to an older version, resulting in a new (possibly worse) bug. This has occurred with respect to the Debian project for example.
 
I installed Ubuntu 24.10 on my Macbook Pro Retina

copied some of my dotfiles like weechat across from Freebsd
and was surprised they didnt work because they were for a newer version

it wasnt intended as "why can't FreeBSD be more like..." thread.

maybe its more to do with the marketing message that Linux/Ubuntu is new and shiny
and has all the latest packages

it was just a surprise to Freebsd 14.2 quarterly branch had more up to date software than Ubuntu 24.10
 
Back
Top