The Case for Rust (in the base system)

It's hard to imagine it getting any worse, isn't it?
The guy after whom McAfee antivirus is named - he was sorely disappointed in how his namesake company and software turned out. And even Bill Gates himself - he started out as a Lisp programmer who actually knows a thing or two about the value of being able to study the source code...
 
Think yourself lucky, you could have had "boris the world king" followed by "cheese-crazy mad liz"
We now have a black rock employee who, owning two private planes, calls himself "middle class". Let's see what he does, but I have my doubts.
 
hahaha... well, you could always try a lettuce, it worked for us, best PM we've had in years

1740585541942.png
 
I would not put this place above Reddit.
Oh I certainly would. The fact that you can share the same account between crypto, hookups, anime memes and FreeBSD, instantly eliminates any semblance of barrier of entry to a community discussing a technical operating system.

On these forums, low effort users and their posts are already slightly filtered out by a trivial signup and email verification process (luckily). Mailing lists even more so because low quality users are seemingly intimidated by "old" processes.

But going back a bit. When it comes to "wider internet", Reddit is so low down on the list, it didn't even come to mind. I was more thinking Stack Overflow, The Register, etc. Actual tech communities rather than glorified social media.
 
Requiring higher effort doesn't filter out ad hominem or no true scotsman.

Anyway, the guy blocking the Rust interface into DMA relinquished his gatekeeping position. So, Asahi can probably get that driver merged.
 
Anyway, the guy blocking the Rust interface into DMA relinquished his gatekeeping position. So, Asahi can probably get that driver merged.
One down in the long queue of experienced developers that remain equally unconvinced :)

Requiring higher effort doesn't filter out ad hominem or no true scotsman.
I don't think either of those terms are correct when referring to people who are skeptical (or overly convinced) about the merits of Rust 🤷‍♂️
 
Oh I certainly would. The fact that you can share the same account between crypto, hookups, anime memes and FreeBSD, instantly eliminates any semblance of barrier of entry to a community discussing a technical operating system.

On these forums, low effort users and their posts are already slightly filtered out by a trivial signup and email verification process (luckily). Mailing lists even more so because low quality users are seemingly intimidated by "old" processes.
to top it off, you can sign into Reddit with Gmail authemtication, no password required, let Google and their advertisers know you went there! 🤣

But sometimes, it does have pretty apt humor that I found to be pretty symbolic of what's happening: snotty brats not out of diapers, showing us the door!
 
Capsicum doesn't get enough love and attention it deserves. I think capsicumizing more of base would be a better use of work and resources IMO. Assuming the regurgitated premise of Rust is "better security". Why rewrite stuff that works for cool points?
i second this, capsicum is really great, would be nice to see sandboxing standardised
 
Shawn Webb's post highlights the issue quite well.
"We also need to come up with a formal method of bringing in vendored #Rust crates into the src tree."
Thats basically where it has already failed. There is going to be multiple hundreds of these things for an entire userland (all fragile bindings against POSIX stuff and other micro-dependency crap). And the upstream will change almost daily, just like NPM, CPAN, PIP does. Crates.io is just another clone of these.
 
Back
Top