Those are all no issues to none of today's OS, even Windows by now is pretty stablesomeone who does online banking, checking emails and cares about stability
Weirdos that like to find what the underlying assumptions are for things that should work, but often don't.who do you think it's the right candidate for FreeBSD?
who do you think it's the right candidate for FreeBSD?
i for one can say #NETBSD is what i hear every person talking about IF they would ever is did i see it running at their house though? .... could the sound_server be working check PIDs for OSS ps -aux reveals virtual_oss -B -D /var/run/virtual_oss/dsp.pid -T /dev/sndstat -S -i 8 -C 2 -c 2 -r 48000 -b 24 -s 8.0ms -f /dev/dsp0 -c 2 -d dsp -t dsp.ctl is that bsd enough... then you test the stream with sox? and if it works pipe to py_http?: using lame:I would say, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, well *BSD in general, some more user friendly, some less are generally for people who are adventorious enough to try things out.
Like Michael W. Lucas said, it is definitely not for cuddling or hand holding.
Most Linux distros now, and Windows, and perhaps OSX ?, do a lot of handholding for you, abstracting the nitty gritty things what other call magic.
In *BSD you do or atleast should not have magic, expecting to do things on your own.
So, yes, I would aggree to NapoleonWils0n using the short form nerd.
Sorry if I sound harsh, but I do not think that FreeBSD is a OS for normies ?, if it is the right terminology.
I am not including you (OP) into that category, I am rather generalazing.
From my experience it is not something like if you want feature X, Y, chances are high that it is already available, packaged, etc... for you on *BSD. * = (Net, Free, Open)BSD.
But I can say, atleast FreeBSD makes hard stuff easy.
For example kernel compiling, building stuff from source, etc...
It is the case for me at least.
Lame does not fall into my category.i for one can say #NETBSD is what i hear every person talking about IF they would ever is did i see it running at their house though? .... could the sound_server be working check PIDs for OSS ps -aux reveals virtual_oss -B -D /var/run/virtual_oss/dsp.pid -T /dev/sndstat -S -i 8 -C 2 -c 2 -r 48000 -b 24 -s 8.0ms -f /dev/dsp0 -c 2 -d dsp -t dsp.ctl is that bsd enough... then you test the stream with sox? and if it works pipe to py_http?: using lame:
Actually, I would not mind a windows clone, but getting better performance in Unix instead of a windows clone or windows itself is something where I could get a headache for 1-2 days setting program X, Y up for UnIx, and it would still be worth it.People who want proper Unix, instead of an open source Windows clone.
i honestly thought this thread was my help topic i posted i said well wah they dont wrike mee!Actually, I would not mind a windows clone, but getting better performance in Unix instead of a windows clone or windows itself is something where I could get a headache for 1-2 days setting program X, Y up for UnIx, and it would still be worth it.
What do you mean exactly ?i honestly thought this thread was my help topic i posted i said well wah they dont wrike mee!![]()
Disagree - Gentoo, Arch, nixOS - these are for nerds tooo.Nerds
Im sure things like this does not care much about what OS you use as many Linux distros are stable including Arch.someone who does online banking, checking emails and cares about stability
Partly, Arch is stable, if you update like every month, to get the bugs solved for some packages really quick.Im sure things like this does not care much about what OS you use as many Linux distros are stable including Arch.
I agree, the most hilarious part is, you need a terminal emulator anyway, being it a DE or WM so, why not use a WM instead ?From my point of view - Desktop is most important part after OS. I dont like DE i love WM`s only ... Qtile,i3,sway,awesome etc
You know, performance wise, it is the best I have ever experienced. No hiccups, no sound issues, hardware wise, and no handholding.But FreeBSD is one of those OS`ses where it has an Aura. You feel like this is it ! Plus - FreeBSD ( do not know how other *BSD based distros interacts ) is a bit more profesional in forums/reddits etc. than Linux distros![]()
I heard that FVWM was discontinued, but I did not know why.one SHOULD know though that FVWM was the window manager of choice which then they switched to KDE when the company offered PCBSD it was KDE
im just a petty scripter <- i can do things by see and sort of infer , if youve heard of android, dsdt, and macports i can go into a script program whatever it is look at something lets say a system update occurs and something doesnt work it asks conform function_a to method_a so you have to look at a new structure for code and ive taught myself to vaguely do code constructionsI heard that FVWM was discontinued, but I did not know why.
Well, money over money.
Another thing I noticed, is it Hatsune Miku Sama on the picture you posted ? <3
I understand Beastie7's post as it includes a cutting remark as a sidewipe at Linux turn-key distries.Actually, I would not mind a windows clone, but getting better performance in Unix
It is. There is FVWM3, last update released 11/24.I heard that FVWM was discontinued, but I did not know why.
To me the prototype of the typical Linux nerd is someone who do not actually use his computer, but thinks he's a hacker, because spends most of his time to customize his machine and try to reinstall all the apps being broken by lost dependencies from the last update, and is very unhappy if he has a rock solid running machine for more than two days, because then he gets bored, and is happy if there is an update that breaks dependencies again, so he finally has something to do with his computer. Otherwise I have no clue why so many people here on FreeBSD run CURRENT, STABLE instead of RELEASE. Must be some habit they brought from Linux.Disagree - Gentoo, Arch, nixOS - these are for nerds tooo.
Well, games fall into the performance issue category, but I do not know about WLAN, because I am using LAN.The performance issues mostly criticized are games, and WLAN. Right?
I actually read that if you do pkg installs from from the official fresh ports, then you can also get pkgs with broken/lost dependencies, but if you are updating ports, and the building from ports, then that issue is reduced, not present at all ?To me the prototype of the typical Linux nerd is someone who do not actually use his computer, but thinks he's a hacker, because spends most of his time to customize his machine and try to reinstall all the apps being broken by lost dependencies from the last update, and is very unhappy if he has a rock solid running machine for more than two days, because then he gets bored, and is happy if there is an update that breaks dependencies again, so he finally has something to do with his computer. Otherwise I have no clue why so many people here on FreeBSD run CURRENT, STABLE instead of RELEASE. Must be some habit they brought from Linux.
My theorie: May be because it's too boring. If it runs rock solid, they have no idea what to do the machine. 'cause that's what you get with RELEASE: An almost always rock solid machine; broken dependencies are seldom. You'd need to think of what you actually need a computer for, and, worse, actually need to start to do something real with it.![]()
A friend of mine said, DEs are designed to get slower and slower by time, but I do not know whether he is right, or not.I don't understand why you can't simply leave Windows alone but it always seems to find a way to eat itself for no reason. This shouldn't be happening since these machines at not connected to any network and aren't being used for anything but booting into one application (or a small loader for a handful of applications) but at least once or twice a year one of them would die for non-hardware related reasons.
I see, Kanjis.I've wasted many hours of my time tracking down instructions littered with Kanji I had to look up and trolling through old archives to get patches to make the games run on the GPU or work with my standard Sanwa joysticks and buttons.
I have not tried it, but can Ryujinx run through linuxulator without having something like a linux environment set up, or wine ?Since it has VMs out of the box, a pretty recent port of wine and any emulator that hasn't been ported can be run through the Linux emulation layer or wine when needed.
What about decompiling the binaries ?A lot of this software has not and will never be ported to a modern console or PC even though they're squatting on the IP and refuse to let anyone else buy it.
I do not know if I can say it on this forum, but maybe the TOR browser could help.Even the stuff that was made for the standard PC in their time are very rare and no known copies exist anymore.
It is also the best OS if you want to play Windows games through wine.FreeBSD is just about the best OS around now if you're interested in running old obscure binaries for most systems that were in common use between the early 1980s and the mid 2000s.
That is the problem with Linux.Linux is decent at it as well. But it's much harder to set all of it up and keep it running. Especially when they seem hell bent on breaking everything in userspace every couple of years now. The kernel might not break userspace but the people writing userspace software certainly do as often as possible.
Well, I think Linus stated something like he does not care about desktops, but is only focused on the server side ?Linux is targetted more at corperate desktops and servers now and not the little guy that likes to mess around and hack on stuff. I suppose the same is true of most of the *BSDs to.
Even if they move, they have options for staying compatible with older FreeBSD versions, I believe from FreeBSD 5 onwards ?But at least they don't move as fast and offer an actual full fledged OS/base system instead of throwing together a bunch of unrelated projects and trying to tie them together with a mountain of garbage.
totally agreeIm sure things like this does not care much about what OS you use as many Linux distros are stable including Arch.
From my point of view - Desktop is most important part after OS. I dont like DE i love WM`s only ... Qtile,i3,sway,awesome etc where real estate is important and multitasking is a life style.
But FreeBSD is one of those OS`ses where it has an Aura. You feel like this is it ! Plus - FreeBSD ( do not know how other *BSD based distros interacts ) is a bit more profesional in forums/reddits etc. than Linux distros![]()