OP
Deleted member 43773
Guest
- Thread Starter
- #76
Me neither.but I cannot let this stand
I always tell myself:"Don't post! Don't post! ..." but ditto.
As I recall those times (late 1980s, early 90s) all computers were a complete package deal only:One main point was IBM's failing to make OS/2 more interesting to the non-business sector.
hw, os, and apps.
Programs available for more than one platform=machine were available, but exceptions.
If you wanted/needed/must use a special software, you had to chose the according machine with its OS.
For most of the common non business users only affordable were the Homecomputers, which by and large were primarily game stations.
IBM, Apple, Commodore, and others thought they can hijack the market for themselves exclusively (IBM prof offices, Commodore home, and Apple music and graphics design, and milk their customers.
Insofar since IBM fired his little subcontractor named Microsoft, Bill Gates freed the computer world from the dependency of a handful greedy companies.
The development afterwards, now facing the dependency of one big greedy company called Microsoft, producing not real high quality sw and milking its customers, is another story, and shall not be told here.
But face it:
Without the independency from IBM there were no PCs like we're used to today.
And not for that prices either.
A halfway serious useful pro-machine for <2k€ in that time? unthinkable. >3...4k!
And I bet even no FreeBSD, or other open source OS would still exist today.
At least not as mature as today.