How mature is FreeBSD for reading file systems?
It is perfectly possible to read/write file systems such as ext3 and ext4, using the ext2fs module that FreeBSD provides. However, I saw reports here on the forum that using ext2fs would be risky, due to the risk of data corruption or any other problem.
For Microsoft file systems, we have the ntfs-3g for read/write in NTFS disks which should probably have been ported to FreeBSD. I assume it would be reliable to use.
For XFS fs, apparently the implementation is not complete according to the manual, only reading data is allowed.
If I need to format a disk that needs to be used in both FreeBSD and Linux, which file system should I adopt? exFAT? UFS? ext?
In summary, how is file system compatibility on FreeBSD?
It is perfectly possible to read/write file systems such as ext3 and ext4, using the ext2fs module that FreeBSD provides. However, I saw reports here on the forum that using ext2fs would be risky, due to the risk of data corruption or any other problem.
For Microsoft file systems, we have the ntfs-3g for read/write in NTFS disks which should probably have been ported to FreeBSD. I assume it would be reliable to use.
For XFS fs, apparently the implementation is not complete according to the manual, only reading data is allowed.
If I need to format a disk that needs to be used in both FreeBSD and Linux, which file system should I adopt? exFAT? UFS? ext?
In summary, how is file system compatibility on FreeBSD?